Tuesday, 9 February 2010

I've seen the future and it works...

So Rajasthan Royals didn't bother running their franchise plans by anyone. Welcome to the future my friends, a future in which the gloves are off. 

Without blowing my own trumpet - oh alright then, blowing my own trumpet - some years ago I sat in a meeting about a certain football club's pre-season tour [translation: coffer-filling third-world smash-and-grab] and heard lots of waffle about 'global reach' and 'brand extension'. I offered up the idea that all of these huge teams should stop fannying about buying feeder clubs and going on tours and just franchise themselves to developing leagues, which, by definition, had no deep-rooted tribal loyalty to the local teams. Thus Manchester United or AC Milan or Barcelona or whoever could have five or six sides playing all over the world: imagine 'Manchester United Japan' and 'Manchester United Australia', or 'AC Milan USA'. The clubs get to sell loads of shirts and have loads of players and the locals get a league with an immediate identity and history. It looked like a no-brainer.

The Royals have beaten them to the punch. But that is not the real battle here - the real battle is between domestic and international cricket. As Shane Warne and many others have said, T20 should be a domestic game. In a globalised market, we are watching the creation of of club brands that might one day operate alongside international teams and play at the same level.

The boards hate it of course, not for any purist reasons but because it will deny them money, at least in the short term.

But in the spirit of the football franchise idea, here's a blueprint: T20 becomes a domestic game. Test cricket remains the pure form. Fifty-over ODI cricket is ditched. In its place comes T40, a two-innings T20 game played only at international level, offering a tactical dimension not available to the club teams and a natural progression for young players. 

Cricket boards of the world - you can have that idea. Cheques to the email address to your right...


4 comments:

Damith S. said...

I remember when Aus A played Aus in a tri nations final with England. With the ridiculous talent that Pak and WI showing here this summer, Australians are more keen to see a state side play Australia than those two.

Unfortunately, what you predict mightn't be too far away!

Louise said...

I remember that Damith. Cheekily, Aus stole Glenn McGrath from Aus A for the finals, didn't they?

Brit said...

Seems like a winner to me. Sign me up.

Russ said...

Louise, no, Paul Reiffel.

Then they made him 12th man.


OB, explain the merits of a T40 game? As far as I can tell, if each innings is reset at no wickets lost, then it is basically a two leg T20 tie, played on the same evening. If the innings is not reset it is a 40 over game with a break in the middle of the innings.

Personally, just ditch the fifty over game, free up some of the schedule for domestic T20, and then get the ICC to pull their fingers out and create domestic and international windows so there are no clashes.