In this new dystopia of county cricket, clubs fielding young players are 'incentivised', thus producing teams full of future champions.
That never works. Sport is a genuine meritocracy, a talentocracy if such a word exists. Mike Tyson could be heavyweight champ at 20, George Foreman at 46. Tendulkar can be an international at 17 and 36. A generation artificially ramped into county teams will be weak, not strong.
The IPL demands young players, too, but then the IPL is not culling at the other end. It runs on nous and star power. It runs on merit and talent. Its the only way.
It's ridiculous.. Look at McGrath at 39.. Yorkshire have changed Hoggard's name to Haggard, that too after being their leading wicket taker in the previous season.. Well done Sirs.
ReplyDeleteStill, Jenny Agutter. So its not all bad.
ReplyDeleteThere's also - and I appreciate that these are the most despised, bottom-of-the-food-chain entities in cricket - the county supporters, who wouldn't mind, you know, if it's alright with Team England, to watch the best players now and again.
ReplyDeleteDidn't Yorkshire unceremoniously dump Fred Trueman at the end of his career too?
ReplyDeleteHi
ReplyDeleteI have started a blog under the title http://cricketcoloumn.blogspot.com which I’d be updating every now and then. Pls visit my blog and incase u find the blog really interesting have a link on your blog. I’ve added your blog under the title “The old batsmen”.Have a great day
Whenever I go to a cricket match or watch one on TV the older players are often the best. Robert Croft, Shane Warne a year or two ago, Ramps, Dominic Cork, Justin Langer and many more. They must surely be teaching by example.
ReplyDeleteAnd Hoggard is still young.
Some good could come out of this. Surrey are in need of a youngish fast bowler . . . .