A passage in Graeme Swann's book - which bears a title so punsomely dreadful that it wouldn't make a caption in the back of Nuts magazine - has poked life into an old story.
He writes: There was a strange dynamic between Andy Caddick and Darren Gough. I found it really weird. They absolutely hated each other but pretended to get on in this pseudo friendship. Their jealousy towards each others success made me feel uneasy.
On hearing of it, Gough, already stoked up by an allegation elsewhere in the book that he'd sucker-punched Swann while he was standing at a urinal - you'll have gathered by now that The Breaks Are Off might not take its place next to Cardus on Cricket in the pantheon - used his radio show on Talksport to rip a few snorters into Swanny's rib-cage. Paraphrased, his response was something like: 'It's absolute rubbish. Me and Andy were competitive, but we were friends too. Before every game together we'd do something like go to the cinema or have a meal or play golf. We're playing golf in a couple of weeks actually. Caddy's one of the few players I've stayed in touch with. I've stayed at his house for a week. I texted him the other day. Why would I do that if it were a pseudo friendship?
'There was a bit of jealousy because I was the golden boy and I got all the contracts, and that might have been a bit because I were a proper Englishman and he were a Kiwi, and we were competitive. If you look at how close were were in the wickets we got, of course we were. But to say there were cliques in the team and we weren't friends is rubbish. That team under Nasser Hussain and Duncan Fletcher and Lord MacLaurin started the process of where we are today.
'You're always better friends with some people in the team than others, but that's not a clique. Vaughan and Collingwood and Giles were always together. Freddie and Steve Harmison were inseparable. At the end of my time, I was always with KP. In this team now, Swanny's always with Jimmy Anderson and Bressie, they spend all day on Twitter winding each other up. Is that a clique?'
It took him less time to say than it does to read, and he seemed far more exercised by it than he had been by the punch allegation, which had come the day before and over which he'd rung Swann direct. Perhaps it's because the story has been so persistent over the years, and it rankles.
In truth there was an almost symbiotic link between the two, in that they unconsciously echoed one another's performances. Gough played 58 Tests and took 229 wickets at 28.39 at a strike rate of 51.6, a best of 6/42 and 14 five wicket hauls. Caddick played 63, taking 234 wickets at 29.91 at a strike rate of 57.9, a best of 7/46 and 13 five-wicket bags. Gough had the edge as a limited overs bowler, Caddick took 1,180 first-class wickets to Goughie's 855.
They played 25 Tests together and were mostly formidable, except in the Ashes of 2001. England's comparative mediocrity during their era can be blamed on many things - three batsman who played more than 100 Tests and averaged less than 40, the failure to develop Hick and Ramprakash, a chaotic selection policy, the lack of central contracts, all of the usual - but not on players with records like Gough and Caddick, who, statistically at least, outbowled Flintoff and Harmison.
You can imagine both having their moments. You might think Gough had a heart like a dustbin lid and Caddick maybe less so, but then look at their numbers. That can't be true, although Gough's bravery in the face of his terminal knee injury pre-dated Flintoff's Leviathan efforts when faced with the same. Caddick by all accounts could be quirky. David Lloyd even called him nerdy, and maybe he was sensitive and inconsistent, but again, the stats say not that often. Anyway, which fast bowler is entirely sane?
Swann's recollection appears coloured by the myth, by the story. He has carefully constructed a personal mythology of his own, and his book will reinforce it. He's in a glass house throwing stones with this one.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Top read as ever. Hadn't clocked that spat so thanks v much. Fair point from DG about that side, too. Never feel Nass gets quite the credit he deserves for throttling England back into the realms of competence.
On the face of it, the prospect of the Christmas book market does strange things to the memories of sportsmen and their publishers. And the OB reveals he reads Nuts magazine. God knows where truth lies.
In his autobiography Playing With Fire, Nasser Hussain indicates there were tensions between the two bowlers: ‘I’m not saying that Gough and Caddick didn’t get on, but you could use their perceived differences to your advantage, and I think I did over the years. Nasser reveals Caddick as an utterly decent man who would go out of his way to help anyone, but who had an unfortunate tendancy to put his foot in it, most notably with Gough when, in 2000 at Lords, the latter had failed yet again to get a 5-wicket haul and his name on the honours board: ‘Caddy just started taking the piss out of Goughy over it, and you think to yourself: ‘Not now Caddy.’ That time Duncan and I had to have a quiet word with him about it, but Caddy hasn’t a malicious bone in his body - he just sometimes says the wrong thing at the wrong time.’ Based on Nasser’s view of the issues, I am more convinced by Gough’s account than that of Swann.
a good take on that 90s Test team - I am guessing that the 3 batters who averaged under 40 were Nasser, Stewart and Atherton? But the selection "policy" was deranged and injury management was pathetic. Strewart's batting was compromised by the lack of decisiveness about who should keep wicket. atherton was surely ground down by the strange teams he got lumbered with (which bowlers will they give me this time) as captain plus his back injury.
I love the way Gough said there wasn't a problem and then in the same sentence he says there may have been jealousy because I (Gough) was the golden boy who got all the contracts.
"There wasn't a problem Andy, but you were jealous of me."
hey, this article is good, i have bookmarked your blog
Swann in a glass house also with his comments on KP's captaincy. This book, at this time.. Leadership?
Declaration Game: Swann, Pieterson and the art of captaincy. wp.me/p1OY5E-1c
You do have to look at the context though. In the 90s, a batting average of just under 40 wasn't too shabby when you remember that many top batsmen such as Mark Waugh, Kirsten and de Silva averaged close to 40 at the time (the averages of the former 2 only picked up in the next decade). By contrast, a bowling average of 28, excellent by today's standards, didn't cut the deal in the 90s, when you had 2-3 bowlers in most good teams who averaged under 25 and often close to 20 (think of Mcgrath-Warne-Gillespie, Donald-Pollock, Wasim-Waqar-Saqlain, Ambrose-Walsh-Bishop).
I also saw that strange dynamic between Andy Caddick and Darren Gough, when I was looking at it, I was like WTF!! hahaha
Post a Comment